BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//AMSE//Event Calendar//FR
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event-10367@www.amse-aixmarseille.fr
DTSTAMP:20260421T211043Z
CREATED:20260421T211043Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260421T211043Z
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:phd seminar - Tatiana Bezdenezhnykh*\, Santiago Lopez** 
DTSTART:20231114T100000Z
DTEND:20231114T113000Z
DESCRIPTION:*Authoritarian regimes increasingly use misinformation to convi
 nce citizens of the regime's competence. Although this approach appears to 
 be effective in shaping public opinion\, citizens may benchmark official ne
 ws against their economic circumstances\, market prices\, and other observa
 bles and update their beliefs accordingly. We document the effect of prop
 aganda on citizens’ beliefs by examining exposure to a Russian state-run 
 annual TV program with Vladimir Putin.  By utilizing Russian individual-le
 vel survey data collected around the program’s air date from 2012 to 2019
 \, we study the program’s impact on a wide range of outcomes\, including 
 personal well-being\, trust in institutions\, and democratic values. We fin
 d that propaganda poses a tradeoff: on the one hand\, it strengthens the re
 gime\, by boosting trust in state agencies and the legal system and diminis
 hing the perceived importance of free press\, elections\, and opposition. O
 n the other hand\, it triggers heightened anxiety about the present and fut
 ure.**When choosing the contribution to a public good\, individual optimiza
 tion (à la Nash) generally leads to suboptimal provision. Moral concerns i
 n this type of game\, allow for a correction of this under-provision. Kanti
 an optimization\, through the universalization of actions\, allows agents t
 o internalize their positive externality over others and recover optimality
 . In this paper\, I study the impact of Kantian optimization on the politic
 al support of redistributive policies. Nashian and Kantian individuals choo
 se distinct levels of public-good contributions given a redistributive poli
 cy\, and these differences shape political preferences. The complementarity
  of private and public goods is a key parameter to understanding the impact
  of moral concerns on the political support of redistributive policies.\\n\
 \nContact: Lucie Giorgi: lucie.giorgi[at]univ-amu.frRicardo Guzman: ricardo
 .guzman[at]univ-amu.frNatalia Labrador: natalia.labrador-bernate[at]univ-a
 mu.frNathan Vieira: nathan.vieira[at]univ-amu.fr\n\nPlus d'informations: ht
 tps://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/en/events/tatiana-bezdenezhnykh-santiago-lop
 ez-0
LOCATION:MEGA - Salle Carine Nourry\, 424\, Chemin du Viaduc\, 13080 Aix-en
 -Provence
URL;VALUE=URI:https://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/en/events/tatiana-bezdenezhnykh-santiago-lopez-0
CONTACT:Lucie Giorgi: lucie.giorgi[at]univ-amu.frRicardo Guzman: ricardo.gu
 zman[at]univ-amu.frNatalia Labrador:&nbsp\;natalia.labrador-bernate[at]univ
 -amu.frNathan Vieira: nathan.vieira[at]univ-amu.fr
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR