BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//AMSE//Event Calendar//FR
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event-13045@www.amse-aixmarseille.fr
DTSTAMP:20260429T082452Z
CREATED:20260429T082452Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260429T082452Z
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:big data and econometrics seminar - Agathe Fernandes Machado
DTSTART:20260203T130000Z
DTEND:20260203T143000Z
DESCRIPTION:Algorithmic fairness refers to the set of principles and techni
 ques aimed at ensuring that the decisions produced by an algorithm are fair
  and non-discriminatory toward all users\, regardless of personal character
 istics such as gender\, ethnicity\, or other so-called sensitive attributes
 . Its assessment can be carried out at multiple levels: on the one hand\, a
 t the group level\, by comparing a model’s predictions across different g
 roups defined by sensitive variables\; and on the other hand\, at the indiv
 idual level\, by focusing on a specific individual from a minority group an
 d asking counterfactual questions such as: “What would this woman’s sal
 ary be if she were a man?” To evaluate algorithmic fairness at the indivi
 dual level\, we adopt the notion of Counterfactual Fairness proposed by Kus
 ner et al. (2017). This approach relies on the mutatis mutandis principle\,
  in contrast to the ceteris paribus principle: rather than checking whether
  a model’s prediction for an individual remains unchanged when only the s
 ensitive attribute is modified while keeping all other explanatory variable
 s constant\, we ask whether the prediction remains the same when only the v
 ariables not causally influenced by the sensitive attribute are held consta
 nt. The definition of Counterfactual Fairness relies on Pearl’s (2009) ca
 usal inference framework and involves computing an individual’s counterfa
 ctual in which the sensitive attribute is modified\, assuming prior knowled
 ge of a causal graph over the model’s explanatory variables. In this stud
 y\, we link two existing approaches to derive counterfactuals: intervention
 -based approaches on a causal graph with quantile preservation\, as propose
 d by Plečko et al. (2020)\, and multivariate optimal transport introduced 
 by Lara et al. (2024). We extend the concepts of “Knothe’s rearrangemen
 t” and “triangular transport” to probabilistic graphical models and e
 stablish the theoretical foundations of a counterfactual approach\, called 
 sequential transport\, to discuss individual-level fairness.\\n\\nContact: 
 Sullivan Hué: sullivan.hue[at]univ-amu.frMichel Lubrano: michel.lubrano[at
 ]univ-amu.fr\n\nPlus d'informations: https://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/en/ev
 ents/agathe-fernandes-machado
LOCATION:Îlot Bernard du Bois - Salle 24\, AMU - AMSE\, 5-9 boulevard Maur
 ice Bourdet\, 13001 Marseille
URL;VALUE=URI:https://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/en/events/agathe-fernandes-machado
CONTACT:Sullivan Hué: sullivan.hue[at]univ-amu.frMichel Lubrano: michel.lu
 brano[at]univ-amu.fr
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
