BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//AMSE//Event Calendar//FR
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event-9448@www.amse-aixmarseille.fr
DTSTAMP:20260415T034222Z
CREATED:20260415T034222Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260415T034222Z
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:phd seminar - Morten Støstad*\, Samuel Delpeuch**
DTSTART:20221115T100000Z
DTEND:20221115T113000Z
DESCRIPTION:*What are the societal consequences of economic inequality\, an
 d how do concerns for these consequences affect individuals' redistributive
  preferences? This paper examines beliefs about how economic inequality cha
 nges society and establishes a causal link between such inequality externa
 lity beliefs and redistributive preferences. Using two representative surv
 eys of a combined 6\,731 U.S. citizens\, we show that a majority of respond
 ents believe that inequality leads to negative societal outcomes through ch
 annels such as increased crime\, deteriorating democratic institutions\, an
 d diminished economic growth. Such beliefs are similar among Democrats and 
 Republicans\, unlike broad economic fairness views which are more polarized
 . We establish a causal link from individuals' inequality externality belie
 fs to their redistributive preferences by using exogenously provided video 
 information treatments. With this and other methods we estimate that inequa
 lity externality beliefs are about two-thirds as impactful for individuals'
  redistributive preferences as broad fairness views. Inequality externality
 -based arguments cause less anger among respondents than fairness-based arg
 uments\, however. Our results thus indicate a potential trade-off in debate
 s on redistributive ideas\; whereas fairness-based arguments are somewhat m
 ore persuasive\, externality-based arguments seem to be less polarizing and
  present an opportunity for consensus-building.**Based on French firm-level
  data over 15 years we evaluate the contribution of the microlevel profit-s
 hifting –through tax haven foreign direct investments– to the aggregate
  productivity slowdown measured in France. We show that firm measured produ
 ctivity in France declines over the immediate years following the establish
 ment in a tax haven\, with an average estimated drop by 3.5% in labor appar
 ent productivity. To isolate the contribution of contribution of multinatio
 nals enterprises' (MNEs) tax optimization to this decline of apparent produ
 ctivity\, we then exploit the 2006 Cadbury-Schweppes decision of the Europe
 an Court of Justice limiting the extent to which member States can counter 
 European MNEs' tax planning strategies. We find that multinational groups b
 enefiting from that loosening of the legal constraints do exhibit lower app
 arent productivity in France following that ruling. Our results moreover su
 ggest that this bias is bigger when firms rely more intensively on intangib
 le capital. Finally\, given these firms’ weight in the economy\, our resu
 lts imply an annual loss of 9.7% in terms of the aggregate annual labor pro
 ductivity growth.\\n\\nContact: Camille Hainnaux: camille.hainnaux[at]univ-
 amu.frDaniela Horta Saenz: daniela.horta-saenz[at]univ-amu.frJade Ponsard: 
 jade.ponsard[at]univ-amu.frNathan Vieira: nathan.vieira[at]univ-amu.fr\n\nP
 lus d'informations: https://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/en/events/morten-st%C3
 %B8stad-samuel-delpeuch-0
LOCATION:Îlot Bernard du Bois - Amphithéâtre\, AMU - AMSE\, 5-9 boulevar
 d Maurice Bourdet\, 13001 Marseille
URL;VALUE=URI:https://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/en/events/morten-st%C3%B8stad-samuel-delpeuch-0
CONTACT:Camille Hainnaux: camille.hainnaux[at]univ-amu.frDaniela Horta Saen
 z: daniela.horta-saenz[at]univ-amu.frJade Ponsard: jade.ponsard[at]univ-amu
 .frNathan Vieira: nathan.vieira[at]univ-amu.fr
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
