BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//AMSE//Event Calendar//FR
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event-7801@www.amse-aixmarseille.fr
DTSTAMP:20260501T001738Z
CREATED:20260501T001738Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260501T001738Z
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:phd seminar - Carolina Ulloa Suarez*\, Anna Zaytseva**
DTSTART:20210112T100000Z
DTEND:20210112T113000Z
DESCRIPTION:*Since the early 2000s\, some countries in Latin America have i
 mplemented fiscal rules to cut down the economic and social costs that fisc
 al indiscipline causes. However\, these rules can breed social costs throug
 h other mechanisms\, questioning whether its implementation is beneficial o
 r not for this purpose. This paper analyses the effect of the implementatio
 n of fiscal rules over income inequality in five Latin American countries. 
 Using the synthetic control approach\, I find evidence that the implementat
 ion of fiscal rules in these countries has not necessarily affected the exi
 stent efforts to bring down inequality. Overall\, the results suggest that 
 any economic stigma that may prevent countries from implementing fiscal rul
 es because of unwanted side effects on inequality is unwarranted. On the co
 ntrary\, it is shown that the type of fiscal rule implemented in each count
 ry is what best explains the existence (or lack thereof) of possible social
  costs such as the increase in income inequality.**Objective: To evaluate p
 erformance of French private practice general practitioners (GPs) practicin
 g in multi-professional group practices (MGP) regarding chronic care manage
 ment during Covid-19 lockdown. Data Sources: Cross-sectional questionnaire 
 of 1\,191 French private practice GPs in April 2020. Study Design: We use s
 elf-reported data on frequency of consultations for chronic patients during
  lockdown compared to their “usual” week before the epidemic. We analyz
 ed data using descriptive statistics and regressions\, with the objective t
 o test whether GPs in MGP had significant different responses to the Covid1
 9 crisis. Principal findings: GPs practicing in areas highly affected by th
 e Covid-19 epidemic were more likely to experience a decline in consultatio
 ns related to complications of chronic diseases. GPs in MGP were less likel
 y to experience a 50% drop in consultations related to follow-up of chronic
  patients and complications of chronic diseases. GPs in MGP were also more 
 proactive to contact their chronic patients. Conclusions: Quick policy resp
 onse is needed to alleviate difficulties encountered by GP practicing outsi
 de MGPs. Results advocate for further development of integrated care in the
  long run.\\n\\nContact: Anushka Chawla : anushka.chawla[at]univ-amu.frKenz
 a Elass : kenza.elass[at]univ-amu.frCarolina Ulloa Suarez : carolina.ulloa-
 suarez[at]univ-amu.fr\n\nPlus d'informations: https://www.amse-aixmarseille
 .fr/fr/evenements/carolina-ulloa-suarez-anna-zaytseva
URL;VALUE=URI:https://www.amse-aixmarseille.fr/fr/evenements/carolina-ulloa-suarez-anna-zaytseva
CONTACT:Anushka Chawla : anushka.chawla[at]univ-amu.frKenza Elass : kenza.e
 lass[at]univ-amu.frCarolina Ulloa Suarez : carolina.ulloa-suarez[at]univ-am
 u.fr
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
