Skip to main content
APRIL 28, 2020
One of the things which led to Covid-19 becoming a catastrophic situation has revealed to be the choices that were made before the pandemic. Regardless of whether these choices were good or not, they were nevertheless made. This therefore leads to the question of how catastrophes influence decision-making in uncertain situations. Theories are able to clearly explain our choices when we have all the elements in hand. However, once exceptional situations occur, such as catastrophes that have disastrous yet very unlikely consequences, these theories reveal to be less pertinent.
Read the article on
https://www.dialogueseconomiques.fr/en/article/decisions-periods-uncertainty-fear-and-catastrophe

Latest publications

Cecilia García Peñalosa: Connections between growth, inequality, and gender
A video interview with Research Professor Cecilia García Peñalosa (CNRS/EHESS/AMSE), who was awarded the CNRS Silver Medal in 2025.
In healthcare, controlling spending comes at the expense of the most disadvantaged.
An article by Marwân-al-Qays Bousmah (INED), Bruno Ventelou (CNRS / AMSE), Mohammad Abu-Zaineh (AMU / AMSE), and Simon Combes (UCL) published by The Conversation.
Economic outlook: fragile stability under pressure as 2027 approaches.
Summary of the discussion between Xavier Ragot, President of the French Economic Observatory, and Alain Trannoy (EHESS/AMSE) at the latest "Café de l’éco" organized by the Cercle des économistes.