Skip to main content
APRIL 28, 2020
One of the things which led to Covid-19 becoming a catastrophic situation has revealed to be the choices that were made before the pandemic. Regardless of whether these choices were good or not, they were nevertheless made. This therefore leads to the question of how catastrophes influence decision-making in uncertain situations. Theories are able to clearly explain our choices when we have all the elements in hand. However, once exceptional situations occur, such as catastrophes that have disastrous yet very unlikely consequences, these theories reveal to be less pertinent.
Read the article on
https://www.dialogueseconomiques.fr/en/article/decisions-periods-uncertainty-fear-and-catastrophe

Latest publications

Focus | Elections Beyond Politics
The outcome of an election does not depend only on the programs and the candidates. The voting system and the strategies of those involved also play a role. Three insights from economics to help better understand some of these mechanisms.
‘Seeking to lower the price of carbon would mean revising Europe’s climate ambitions downwards.’
A collective op-ed published by Le Monde, co-signed by Fanny Henriet (CNRS/AMSE).
Municipalities: considerable challenges to overcome
Alain Trannoy (EHESS/AMSE) in the “Cercle des économistes” column published in Les Echos.