AMU - AMSE
5-9 Boulevard Maurice Bourdet, CS 50498
13205 Marseille Cedex 1
Ventelou
Publications
Objectives To assess the risk of leaving employment for cancer survivors 2 years after diagnosis and the role of workplace discrimination in this risk.Methods A representative sample of 4270 French individuals older than 17 and younger than 58 years when diagnosed with cancer in 2002 were interviewed 2 years later. Their occupational status was analyzed with the help of Probit and IV-Probit models.Results Overall, 66% of the cancer survivors who were working at the time of diagnosis were still employed 2 years later. Age, education level, income at diagnosis, work contract, professional status, affective support, relative prognosis at diagnosis, tumor site and treatment have contrasting impacts upon the probability of job loss across gender. Even after having controlled for these variables, self-reported workplace discrimination increases the probability of job loss by 15%.Conclusions Despite protective labor law and favorable health insurance arrangements, French cancer survivors continue to experience problems to stay in or to return to the labor force. Measures targeting only the employment protection of cancer survivors do not seem to be sufficient to end prior social inequalities in job attainment. Intervention for specific populations particularly exposed to job-loss risks would also be needed.
BACKGROUND:
The analysis of "professional motivations", mainly through the possible crowding-out effects between extrinsic and intrinsic motivations, has become an issue of great concern in the economic literature. This paper aims at applying this topic to the healthcare professions where the proper scaling up of pay-for-performance (P4P) policies by public authorities is at stake.
METHODS:
We used a panel of 528 self-employed general practitioners in the "Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur" region in France to provide an interpersonal statistical decomposition between extrinsic and intrinsic motivations with regard to preventive actions. Then, we applied a Tobit model in order to specify the main explicative variables of the share of intrinsic motivations entering into physicians' total motivations.
RESULTS:
The relative share of intrinsic motivations was quite high among physicians paid with fixed fees. We found a significant effect of age on intrinsic motivations describing a U-shaped curve which can be interpreted as being the result of a "life cycle of medical motivations" or a generational effect.
CONCLUSION:
The cross-sectional nature of the data does not allow us to draw any conclusions concerning the predominance of the generational effect or the "life cycle effect" on the evolution of the relative share of physician's intrinsic motivations. Nevertheless, the U-shaped relation between intrinsic motivations and age questions the suitability of using uniformly P4P mechanisms. The generations or age groups of self-employed physicians who seem to be less responsive to extrinsic motivations are more likely to favour the introduction of other types of payment schemes (capitation or salary systems) or regulation tools such as clinical practice guidelines.
The relationship between the length of GP consultation in primary care and drug prescribing practices is still a subject for debate. Patients' morbidity, generating both very long consultation times and large volumes of prescriptions, may mask an underlying substitution among GPs regarding the length of time they offer to patients versus the alternative of prescribing pharmaceuticals. We propose to pursue the debate by analyzing the results of a case vignette, submitted to 1,900 GPs, in which patient morbidity is controlled for by definition. In this case - a hypothetical patient suffering from mild depression - we observe the choice between three types of treatment strategy: psychotherapy, drug therapy and a combination of the two. We observe that the GPs with the highest consultation rates were twice as likely to adopt the drug therapy option as their counterparts with lower rates of consultation. Moreover, for more than 50% of drug prescriptions, the medical decisions contradict clinical practice guidelines.
Since 2000, the fight against aids, tuberculosis and malaria has contributed to significant shifts in the main paradigms of the health economics literature applied to developing countries: improvements in public health of the population are now considered a prerequisite, rather than a consequence, of economic growth; for health care financing, priority is given to promoting prepayment and health insurance mechanisms rather than "cost recovery" policies and user fees at the point of consumption; differential pricing for access to essential medicines and flexibility in international norms for intellectual property rights are increasingly recommended; disease-targeted "vertical" programs are viewed as a way to improve efficiency and strengthen health care systems as a whole. The article discusses the theoretical and empirical limitations of these new paradigms. Classification JEL : G22, I1, I18, O11, O34
The book is based on original data and field studies from Brazil, Thailand, India and Sub-Saharan Africa. Focusing on the issue of universal and free access to treatment (a goal now taken to heart by the international community), it assesses the progress made and presents a rigorous diagnosis of the obstacles that remain, especially the constraints imposed by TRIPS and the poor state of most public health systems in Southern countries. In so doing, the book renews our understanding of the political economy of HIV/AIDS in these vast regions, where it continues to spread with devastating social and economic consequences.
Cancer survivors frequently shift to part-time job, unemployment and early retirement, probably more than the general population. We re-evaluated the impact of cancer in the labour market, using ?comparative? transition matrices between occupational states. The proper consequences of cancer were measured by a significant deviation of the transition matrix for cancer survivors, compared to a prior matrix standardised on the general population. The methodology was declined with stratifications by social class or gender. We disentangle whether systematic differences in socioeconomic status regarding ability to return to work, are illness related (cancer sites or diagnosis prognosis), or job related (physical demands). Results of the paper are in favour of a specific concern of the policy-maker towards manual workers affected by cancer. JEL classification: I10 ; J210 ; J24.
No abstract is available for this item.
No abstract is available for this item.





