Emma Paladino*, Ali Hassan**

Internal seminars
phd seminar

Emma Paladino*, Ali Hassan**

AMSE
Hiding the Queen: Anonymous Competitions and Gender Performance in a Randomized Chess Experiment*
Impact investor behavior**
Joint with
Aliénor Bisantis, Jose de Sousa*
Jean-Baptiste Hasse, Christelle Lecourt**
Venue

IBD Amphi

Îlot Bernard du Bois - Amphithéâtre

AMU - AMSE
5-9 boulevard Maurice Bourdet
13001 Marseille

Date(s)
Tuesday, May 13 2025| 11:00am to 12:30pm
Contact(s)

Philippine Escudié: philippine.escudie[at]univ-amu.fr
Lucie Giorgi: lucie.giorgi[at]univ-amu.fr
Kla Kouadio: kla.kouadio[at]univ-amu.fr
Lola Soubeyrand: lola.soubeyrand[at]univ-amu.fr

Abstract

*Despite progress toward gender equality, women remain underrepresented in leadership position, especially in competitive fields. With women comprising merely 10% of internationally rated players and less than 2% of the global top 1,000, chess exemplifies a male-dominated highly-competitive domain. While research shows gender performance gaps in chess competitions, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This paper examines how gender-based interactions influence performance and participation in chess tournaments through a randomized controlled trial. Participants are assigned to either a "blind" group (without information about opponents' gender) or a "non-blind" group. By analyzing performance across different game configurations, we isolate causal mechanisms driving difference in gender performance. We aim to determine whether male players adjust strategy when facing female opponents, whether female players' performance changes when competing against males, or wheter both mechanisms are in place.

**This paper explores how investor intentionality influences financial performance in sustainable finance. Building on a utility-based theoretical framework, we distinguish between impact and ESG investors based on their preferences for non-financial outcomes. Using confidential data from a leading French impact funds management firm, we examine whether impact and ESG funds exhibit different return-risk profiles and whether stronger ESG preferences are associated with lower financial returns. Empirical analyses, supported by multiple robustness checks, reveal a modest negative relationship between ESG scores and returns, along with differences in risk-return dynamics. Our findings suggest that intentionality, rather than ESG preferences alone, drives distinct investment outcomes.